References

QOAM’s journal composition. Maurits van der Graaf, member Advisory Board QOAM.
Quantitative analysis of QOAM’s journal list in terms of journal types and publisher size.
A publisher publishes an article. At what price? Leo Waaijers
Experiences with the offsetting deals in the Netherlands.
Two market places for academic journals compared: QOAM and Journal Browser. Leo Waaijers.
A concise comparison of the new Dutch market place Journal Browser and QOAM.
QOAM sustainability plan. Pleiade Management and Consultancy BV
An international expert workshop was held to discuss the possibilities for an economic model to sustain QOAM – Quality Open Access Marker.
Peer Review Quality and Transparency of the Peer-Review Process in Open Access and Subscription Journals. Jelte Wicherts
The transparency of a journals web site about the peer-review process predicts academic quality in new journals. QOAM measures this transparency via its Base Score Card.
Quality Open Access Marker and Other Initiatives: A Comparative Analysis Danielle van Gerestein.
The article compares QOAM to the following initiatives:
Methods to stop predatory journals. Margot Wehrmeijer.
This thesis looks at three possible methods to stop predatory journals: black- and white-lists, open peer review systems and new metrics.